Fundamental rights

Having a right and being able to enforce it are different things. Everything turns on the available remedy and the deadline.

Illustration: Fundamental rights

Why this page is on AffectionPlus

They come into play at two moments in a family's life. In proceedings first: a divorce, an inheritance, a custody decision are argued on this ground too — fair trial, equality between spouses, respect for private and family life, the best interests of the child. It is the argument you reach for when the national rule produces a plainly unjust result.

In campaigning second: these are the rights invoked to change a law. Opening marriage to same-sex couples, paternity leave, shared custody, family benefits, recognising or banning polygamous marriage — every time a rule of family life has shifted somewhere, someone leaned on a fundamental right first. Anyone who wants a law to change starts here.

Who can strike down a law?

This is the first question, and the answer divides the world in two. In some countries a constitutional court can invalidate a statute that conflicts with protected rights. In others the court can only declare the incompatibility, leaving the statute in force until the legislature acts. A third pattern exists: domestic legislation is shielded from review, but a ratified international treaty allows its application to be challenged indirectly. Knowing which pattern applies determines the whole strategy.

Who do rights bind?

Fundamental rights are aimed first at the state. Against an employer, a landlord or a trader they often apply only indirectly, through private law or through anti-discrimination legislation. A few systems go further and make their catalogue of rights enforceable between private parties; others have given that job to a specialised commission. In practice, for a dispute with a private actor, it is almost always the discrimination route that works.

Non-judicial remedies, consistently underused

Ombudsmen, national human rights institutions and regulators are free, accessible without a lawyer and often effective. Some have real powers — to investigate, to order, sometimes to award compensation — while others only make recommendations, which nonetheless carry weight with the body concerned. Approaching them generally does not stop court deadlines running, so both routes have to be handled in parallel.

Regional and international remedies

Almost all of them require domestic remedies to be exhausted and impose a short deadline running from the final domestic decision. A few regional mechanisms are the exception and accept direct individual applications without exhaustion, which makes them the most accessible route where they exist. Individual access sometimes depends on an optional declaration that a state can withdraw: check that before doing anything else.

Deadlines are the leading cause of failure

Rights claims are confined within short time limits — often weeks or a few months from notification of a decision — and they are almost never extended. Record the date you received each decision as soon as it arrives and check the applicable deadline immediately, before you even decide whether to act.

The law country by country

The legal framework, the procedure, the time limits and the costs differ from one country to another. Each country below has a detailed page: governing texts, key facts, the actual procedure, costs, where to go and the traps to avoid.

Select a country to open its detailed page.

European framework

European Union

The Charter has had the same legal value as the Treaties since 2009, but it binds member states only when they implement Union law.

Britain and Ireland

United Kingdom

Courts can declare a statute incompatible with rights — but they cannot strike it down. Parliament has the last word.

Ireland

Unusually strong: the courts can and do strike down statutes as unconstitutional, and unenumerated rights have been recognised.

North America

United States

Courts can strike down any law — but the Constitution binds the government, not private parties.

Canada

The Charter can strike down laws — but section 33 lets a legislature override several of its guarantees for five years at a time.

Australia and New Zealand

Australia

The only major common law democracy with no national bill of rights; protection comes from statutes, three sub-national charters, and implied constitutional freedoms.

New Zealand

The Bill of Rights cannot override legislation, but since 2022 courts can formally declare a statute inconsistent and the government must respond.

South Asia

India

Article 32 lets you go straight to the Supreme Court — a right that Ambedkar called the heart and soul of the Constitution.

Pakistan

The Supreme Court can take up a matter of public importance on its own motion under Article 184(3).

South-East and East Asia

Singapore

Part IV of the Constitution sets out fundamental liberties, subject to broad legislative restriction.

Malaysia

Part II of the Federal Constitution, with SUHAKAM as the national human rights commission.

Philippines

Two constitutional remedies found almost nowhere else: the writ of amparo and the writ of habeas data.

Hong Kong

The Basic Law and the Bill of Rights Ordinance apply the ICCPR locally, within a framework reshaped by national security legislation.

Africa

South Africa

One of the world's most far-reaching Bills of Rights: it binds private parties and makes social and economic rights justiciable.

Nigeria

A dedicated fast-track procedure — the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Rules — plus direct access to the ECOWAS Court.

Kenya

Article 22 opens the courts to anyone, with no filing fee and no need to show personal injury.

Ghana

Article 33 gives a direct High Court remedy, and CHRAJ investigates free of charge with quasi-judicial powers.

Uganda

The Uganda Human Rights Commission can itself award compensation — a power few national institutions have.

Zambia

Part III of the Constitution, enforced by the High Court under Article 28, with a Human Rights Commission alongside.

The Caribbean

Jamaica

The 2011 Charter replaced the old chapter on rights and binds private parties in some respects.

Trinidad and Tobago

A constitutional motion gives direct access to the High Court — but the country left the American Convention in 1998.

This topic is also covered for French-speaking countries · German-speaking countries.

Further reading

Links to official or reference sources. They open in a new tab.

Page checked in September 2026. The instruments cited can change: if in doubt, confirm with the official source given.

Locate this page in the site map

A question, a correction, a suggestion? Write to us.