Which contraception suits me?

Eight questions, a minute, and a direction: the methods that fit your situation, and those that cannot.

Appear on this page

Get our daily news watch

There is no best contraception: there is the one that survives your life. A pill that is perfectly effective in theory stops being so if you forget it three times a month; a coil that suits a friend may not suit you.

This questionnaire prescribes nothing. It sorts: it rules out what is contraindicated in your case and puts two or three methods forward. The decision is then made at an appointment.

A questionnaire with answer choices: answer question after question, and your result appears at the end.

Real-world effectiveness, method by method

The figure that matters is not the one in the leaflet. Leaflets give effectiveness in perfect use: a pill taken every day at the same hour, a condom put on correctly every time. The column below gives typical use — pregnancies observed in a hundred people over a year, missed pills and accidents included. The gap is striking for anything that depends on you: 0.3% in perfect use for the pill, 7% in real life.

MethodPregnancies in a year, typical useDurationHormones
Implant0.1%3 yearsyes
Hormonal coil0.1 to 0.4%5 to 8 yearsyes
Vasectomy0.15%permanentno
Tubal occlusion0.5%permanentno
Copper coil0.8%5 to 10 yearsno
Three-monthly injection4%3 monthsyes
Pill, patch, ring7%daily to monthlyyes
External condom13%every actno
Diaphragm with spermicide17%every actno
Withdrawal20%every actno
Internal condom21%every actno
Fertility awareness2 to 23%dailyno
No method85%——
A counsellor lays out the different contraceptive methods for a couple
Implant, IUDs, pill, condom, injection: in typical use, long-acting methods come out ahead because they take human error out of the equation.

Two ways to read this table. First: long-acting methods dominate, not because they are better designed but because they take human error out of the equation. Second: the condom is the least effective of the common methods and the only one that protects against infection. Both are true at once, which is why so many couples use two methods together.

The contraindications that actually change the answer

Most received ideas about hormones do not hold up. A few situations, however, do rule out combined methods — the ones containing oestrogen, meaning the combined pill, the patch and the ring: migraine with aura, a previous clot or embolism, poorly controlled high blood pressure, smoking over 35, breast cancer, severe liver disease, and the first weeks after giving birth.

None of these rules out contraception altogether: the coil, the implant and progestogen-only methods remain available. That is why the questionnaire asks about it before anything else.

What the questionnaire cannot do

It does not know your blood pressure, your family history or your current medication — some anti-epileptics and some antibiotics reduce the effectiveness of hormonal contraception. It also ignores cost: what you pay depends entirely on the country, and sometimes on your age. The country pages under contraception have the detail.

Read next

Sources

  1. Contraception and Birth Control Methods — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2024
  2. Chapter 1 – Combined Oral Contraceptives (Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers) — World Health Organization and Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, accessed 2026
  3. How Effective? (Withdrawal) — Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers — World Health Organization and Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, accessed 2026
  4. Planification familiale / méthodes de contraception (aide-mémoire) — World Health Organization (WHO), 2025 (in French)
  5. Appendix D: Classifications for Combined Hormonal Contraceptives (U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024) — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2024

Official or institutional documents this page relies on, consulted on 12 October 2026. Links open in a new tab.

Page checked in . The instruments cited can change: if in doubt, confirm with the official source given.

Text prepared with artificial intelligence, reviewed and checked by the AffectionPlus team (method and sources: About). This content does not replace medical or legal advice. Spotted an error? Write to us.

Locate this page in the site map