International couples: marriage, property regime, children, inheritance

Marrying abroad or marrying a foreigner is easy; having the marriage recognised at home, choosing the law that governs your property, protecting the children and settling an estate spread over two countries is much less so. The common rules, and the Hague Conventions explained.

Appear on this page

On social media

Posts spotted on 06 July 2026 about this topic, from official sources, media or recognised figures. They reflect their authors' views.

Video · TikTok

Why intercultural couples struggle to discuss the move abroad

— A psychologist who moved abroad for love describes a pattern she sees in intercultural couples she works with: the challenges of relocating and living between cultures are hard to talk about openly. The video encourages couples to name these difficulties early.

TikTok · @drsarahquinley

Get our daily news watch

Marrying abroad, or marrying someone from another country

A marriage celebrated in a country according to that country's forms is in principle valid everywhere: it is the oldest rule of private international law. What varies is what each country demands of its own nationals before and after the ceremony. Almost all ask for the same things, under different names.

A Franco-Portuguese couple marries in a civil ceremony before a registrar in Portugal
A marriage celebrated in a country according to that country's forms is in principle valid everywhere; what varies is what each state requires of its nationals before and after.

Three traps recur. Polygamy: in countries where it is allowed, check that your future spouse is not already married, because a second marriage is void in monogamous countries, even if celebrated at home. Religion: several countries forbid a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim, which in practice requires a prior conversion — Morocco and Egypt provide for it, Tunisia dropped the rule in 2017 — failing which the marriage is not registered there and the couple is deemed to be cohabiting. Forced or sham marriage: most countries allow the deceived spouse to seek annulment, and refuse a residence permit or nationality when there was no real intention to marry.

Finally, marriage never has an automatic effect on nationality or on the right to reside. Both are obtained by a separate application, after a period of marriage and shared life ranging from two to five years depending on the country, with conditions on income, housing and often language. The details for each country are in the civil marriage pages.

Which law governs the couple's property?

A couple of two nationalities, or settled outside its home country, falls under a matrimonial property regime it often did not choose and discovers at divorce or death. The principle, almost everywhere: the spouses may choose the applicable law, among those of the nationality or habitual residence of either of them, by marriage contract; absent a choice, the law of their first common habitual residence after the marriage applies — not that of the place of the ceremony.

At the notary's, a binational couple signs their marriage contract, two passports on the desk
Two passports, one marriage contract: by choosing the applicable law at the notary's, the couple keeps its first shared home from deciding in its place.

In the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 sets these rules for marriages celebrated since 29 January 2019 in the participating states — France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Germany, Austria, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and a dozen others —, with an important novelty: the law so determined no longer changes by itself. For marriages celebrated between 1 September 1992 and 28 January 2019, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands still apply the Hague Convention of 14 March 1978, which provides for an automatic change of law in three cases: when the spouses settle in a state of which both are nationals, when they have lived for more than ten years in the same state, or, if their regime was governed by their common nationality because they had no common residence after the marriage, as soon as they settle together in the same state. Couples married in the 2000s have thus changed regime without knowing it. Outside these texts, each country has its own rule — Switzerland uses the common domicile, Quebec the first residence, the United Kingdom has no matrimonial regime at all and lets the judge divide.

The advice is the same everywhere: a marriage contract, even a short one, naming the law and the regime, beats the default rule; and it can be made or changed after the marriage.

The children of an international couple

Parentage and name. The child generally has the nationality of each parent when their countries pass nationality by descent, and sometimes that of the country of birth: dual nationality is the normal situation of these children. The surname follows the law of the child's nationality or of the country of the birth record depending on the country, which produces different names from one passport to another; in the European Union, a name validly given in one state must be recognised in the others. Register the birth with the consulate of each country.

A binational couple registering a birth at a consulate counter, a pram beside them
Register the birth at each country's consulate: the child of an international couple often has two nationalities, and sometimes two names.

Parental responsibility and residence. The competent judge is that of the child's habitual residence, and most often applies his own law: that is the rule of the 1996 Hague Convention and, in the Union, of the "Brussels IIb" regulation. A parent who takes the child to another country without the written agreement of the other or of a judge commits an abduction within the meaning of the 1980 Hague Convention: more than a hundred states order the child's return, often within weeks, without examining custody. Before any move abroad, the agreement or the judgment — no exception. The page on custody and maintenance details the remedies, including travel bans.

Child maintenance fixed in one country is recovered in another thanks to the 2007 Hague Convention and, in the Union, to a dedicated regulation, through central authorities: slow, but effective. Intercountry adoption is governed by the 1993 Hague Convention, which requires approval in the receiving country and forbids any profit: see the adoption page.

International inheritance

A notary explaining an inheritance file to an older man in her office
Since 2015 in the European Union, a single law governs the whole estate: that of the deceased's last residence, unless chosen otherwise by will.

An estate is international as soon as something links it to another country: assets abroad, a nationality or residence of the deceased different from that of the heirs. The question is then: which law says who inherits, and how much? In the European Union, Regulation (EU) 650/2012 has applied since 17 August 2015 a single law to the whole estate — that of the deceased's last habitual residence — unless he chose, by will, the law of his nationality; it also creates a European certificate of succession recognised in all participating states (Denmark and Ireland are outside the system). Outside the Union, many countries — the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada — apply the law of the place where real property is located to that property and the law of the domicile to the rest, which "splits" the estate and can bring contradictory laws into play.

The stakes are concrete: civil-law countries reserve a share for the children (forced heirship), common-law countries let everything be left freely, and the surviving spouse's share ranges from everything to nothing. A will that designates the applicable law, drawn up in a form recognised everywhere — the 1961 Hague Convention on the form of wills sees to that —, is the only way to know in advance. An old piece of advice still holds: the spouse who settles abroad keeps an account and, if possible, assets in the home country. Details are on the inheritance and gifts between spouses and inheritance pages.

The Hague Conventions, explained

A clerk's hands affixing a seal to an official document at a counter
The apostille (1961 Hague Convention): a single stamp that gets your birth and marriage certificates and judgments accepted in over 120 countries.

The Hague Conference on Private International Law is the organisation that has negotiated, since 1893, the treaties by which countries agree on which court has jurisdiction, which law applies and how each recognises the others' decisions. Seven of its conventions directly concern an international couple.

ConventionWhat it doesWhat it changes for you
Apostille (5 October 1961) — over 120 states Replaces the chain legalisation of public documents by a single stamp, the apostille, affixed by the state of origin. Your birth and marriage certificates, judgments and diplomas are accepted abroad with an apostille; between EU states, a 2019 regulation even dispenses civil status documents from the apostille, with multilingual forms.
Form of wills (5 October 1961) A will is formally valid if it complies with the law of the place where it was made, or of the testator's nationality, domicile or residence. A will drawn up at home is not void abroad on a question of form.
Matrimonial property regimes (14 March 1978) — France, Luxembourg, Netherlands Sets the law applicable to the spouses' property: limited choice, otherwise first common residence; automatic change in some cases. Still governs couples married between 1992 and January 2019 in those three countries; since replaced by EU Regulation 2016/1103.
Celebration and recognition of marriages (14 March 1978) — Australia, Luxembourg, Netherlands A marriage valid in the state of celebration is recognised in the other contracting states. Few countries have ratified it; recognition most often rests on national law and registration.
International child abduction (25 October 1980) — over 100 states Organises the prompt return of a child wrongfully removed or retained to the country of habitual residence, through central authorities. Leaving with the child without agreement triggers a return procedure; conversely, it is the remedy of the parent left behind.
Intercountry adoption (29 May 1993) — over 100 states Frames adoption between countries: central authorities, approval of adopters, free consent of birth parents, ban on profit. An adoption made under the convention is recognised by operation of law in the other contracting states.
Protection of children (19 October 1996) — some fifty states Gives jurisdiction to the judge of the child's habitual residence for parental responsibility, custody and protection, and has his decisions recognised. A custody judgment given in a contracting state is recognised in the others without a new trial.
Recovery of maintenance (23 November 2007) — European Union, United States, Brazil, Turkey, Ukraine… Allows child or spousal maintenance to be enforced abroad, through central authorities, free of charge for the creditor in most cases. A debtor who has moved abroad does not escape maintenance, but count in months.

The lists of contracting states change: they are kept up to date on the website of the Hague Conference (hcch.net). The dates given are those of signature.

The law country by country

The exact formalities — who issues the capacity certificate, where to register, how long before nationality — are specific to each country. They are in the country pages on civil marriage, property regimes and inheritance.

Sources

  1. Régimes patrimoniaux des couples internationaux — European Commission, 2026 (in French): choice of law (residence or nationality of either spouse, written, dated and signed agreement); otherwise first common habitual residence; 18 participating countries
  2. Règlement (UE) 2016/1103 du Conseil du 24 juin 2016 mettant en œuvre la coopération renforcée dans le domaine de la compétence, de la loi applicable, de la reconnaissance et de l'exécution des décisions en matière de régimes matrimoniaux — eur-lex.europa.eu, 2016 (in French): arts 22 (choice and change of law), 26 (law absent a choice), 69-70 (spouses married or choosing the law after 29 January 2019); recital 46: no change of law without the spouses' request
  3. Convention du 14 mars 1978 sur la loi applicable aux régimes matrimoniaux — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 1978 (in French): arts 3 (limited choice), 4 (first habitual residence) and 7 (automatic change of law, notably after more than ten years' residence)
  4. Convention du 14 mars 1978 sur la loi applicable aux régimes matrimoniaux : état présent — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 2026 (in French): three Contracting States (France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands), in force since 1 September 1992
  5. Convention du 14 mars 1978 sur la célébration et la reconnaissance de la validité des mariages : état présent — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 2026 (in French): only three Contracting States: Australia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands
  6. Responsabilité parentale – Garde des enfants et droit de visite — European Commission, European e-Justice Portal, 2026 (in French): Regulation (EU) 2019/1111 (Brussels II ter): jurisdiction of the court of the child's habitual residence, decisions enforceable in all Member States without a special procedure
  7. Convention du 19 octobre 1996 concernant la compétence, la loi applicable, la reconnaissance, l'exécution et la coopération en matière de responsabilité parentale et de mesures de protection des enfants — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 1996 (in French): arts 5 (jurisdiction of the child's habitual residence), 15 (authorities apply their own law), 23 (recognition by operation of law)
  8. Convention du 25 octobre 1980 sur les aspects civils de l'enlèvement international d'enfants : état présent — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 2026 (in French): 103 Contracting Parties
  9. Convention du 25 octobre 1980 sur les aspects civils de l'enlèvement international d'enfants — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 1980 (in French): arts 1 and 12 (prompt return), 11 (decision expected within six weeks), 19 (return does not decide custody)
  10. Pensions alimentaires — European Commission, European e-Justice Portal, 2025 (in French): EU maintenance regulation applied since 18 June 2011, cooperation between central authorities, 2007 Hague Convention with non-EU countries
  11. Convention du 23 novembre 2007 sur le recouvrement international des aliments destinés aux enfants et à d'autres membres de la famille — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 2007 (in French): arts 1 (international recovery of maintenance), 4 (Central Authorities), 15 (free legal assistance for child support under 21)
  12. Convention du 23 novembre 2007 sur le recouvrement international des aliments : état présent — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 2026 (in French): 57 parties, including the European Union, the United States, Brazil, Türkiye and Ukraine
  13. Convention du 29 mai 1993 sur la protection des enfants et la coopération en matière d'adoption internationale — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 1993 (in French): arts 4 (free consent of parents), 5 (adopters found eligible by the receiving State), 6 (Central Authorities), 23 (recognition by operation of law), 32 (no improper financial gain)
  14. Convention du 29 mai 1993 sur l'adoption internationale : état présent — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 2025 (in French): 107 Contracting Parties
  15. Successions — European Commission, European e-Justice Portal, 2026 (in French): succession regulation: deaths from 17 August 2015, law of last habitual residence unless the law of nationality is chosen, European Certificate of Succession, Denmark and Ireland excluded
  16. Convention du 5 octobre 1961 sur les conflits de lois en matière de forme des dispositions testamentaires — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 1961 (in French): art. 1: a will is formally valid under the law of the place where made, or of the testator's nationality, domicile or habitual residence
  17. Convention du 5 octobre 1961 supprimant l'exigence de la légalisation des actes publics étrangers — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 1961 (in French): arts 2-3: no legalisation, the only formality is an apostille issued by the State of origin
  18. Convention Apostille du 5 octobre 1961 : état présent — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), 2026 (in French): 130 Contracting Parties
  19. Faire reconnaître des documents publics dans l'UE — European Commission, 2025 (in French): between EU countries, no apostille for civil-status documents (birth, marriage, capacity to marry) and a multilingual form instead of a translation
  20. À propos de la HCCH — Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH), accessed 2026 (in French): the Conference dates back to 1893; its conventions settle which court has jurisdiction, which law applies and how decisions are recognised

Official or institutional documents this page relies on, consulted on 12 October 2026. Links open in a new tab.

Page checked in . The data cited can change.

Text prepared with artificial intelligence, reviewed and checked by the AffectionPlus team (method and sources: About). This content does not replace medical or legal advice. Spotted an error? Write to us.

Locate this page in the site map