Female genital mutilation — Uganda

Prohibited since 2010, with prevalence confined to two communities and a persistent pattern of cross-border cutting.

Location map — Uganda — Female genital mutilation
Uganda. Simplified location map — Natural Earth data, public domain.

The legal framework

The Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act 2010 created a comprehensive offence, including aggravated FGM carrying life imprisonment, and made failure to report an offence. National prevalence is very low, but the practice persists among the Sabiny in the east and the Pokot in the north-east, where girls are sometimes taken across the border into Kenya to be cut.

Uganda prohibited the practice in 2010 with a dedicated Act, and the Constitutional Court has upheld it against a cultural-rights challenge. Prevalence is confined to two communities in the east and north-east. The recurring difficulty is the same as in Kenya: girls taken across the border for the procedure, and ceremonies moved to remote locations or carried out on younger children to avoid detection.

Key points

StatuteProhibition of Female Genital Mutilation Act 2010
Aggravated FGMCarries life imprisonment where death results or the victim is disabled
Failure to reportAn offence
PrevalenceVery low nationally, concentrated among the Sabiny and Pokot
Cross-borderGirls are sometimes taken into Kenya to avoid the law
Alternative ritesCommunity programmes replace cutting with other ceremonies
CareAvailable in regional referral hospitals

In practice

Cost and coverage

Reporting and public health care are free or low cost.

Where to go

Worth knowing

Cross-border cutting between Uganda and Kenya is the central enforcement problem. Both countries' laws follow residence, so the journey does not put anyone beyond reach.

Frequently asked questions

What penalties does the 2010 Act set?

Imprisonment for the offence, with a higher penalty — up to life — for aggravated cases, including where the victim dies, is disabled or is infected with HIV. Attempting, aiding or failing to report are also offences.

Has the law been challenged?

Yes, on cultural-rights grounds, and the Constitutional Court upheld it, holding that the practice cannot be justified as culture where it violates the right to health and dignity. That judgment is regularly cited across the region.

Official sources and links

← All countries The general article on this topic →

Page checked in September 2026. The instruments cited can change: if in doubt, confirm with the official source given.

Locate this page in the site map

A question, a correction, a suggestion? Write to us.